Skip to main content

A Repeatable Framework for Selecting Accessible Digital Tools

Case Study

Seattle Public Library

Person standing in the aisle reading a book at the Seattle Public Library.
Sign announcing an App Testing at the Douglas Truth Branch of the Seattle Public Library.
Application screens of a Library mobile app.

The Problem

Seattle Public Library faced a challenge—choosing a mobile app that met its community’s diverse and changing needs. They wanted a digital platform where users could easily browse and check out books, register for events, see library hours, and manage their accounts.

After shortlisting 2 apps, 1 question remained: Which one was the best fit?

To ensure they made the right decision, Seattle Public Library prioritized inclusivity. The app needed to be functional, accessible, and easy to use, especially for underserved communities. This included older adults, low-income people, people with disabilities, communities of color, and non-English speakers. The library’s main goal was to provide everyone with equal access to its many resources, no matter their background or abilities.

The Solution 

Seattle Public Library asked us to help choose their ideal app by using human-centered design to focus on accessibility. 

Step 1: Custom Review Standards 
We created custom standards to review the 2 apps based on Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 AA and our 10 Facets of Great User Experience (UX). Our team used them to assess functionality, accessibility, and usability. 

Person sitting at a desk testing an app during an in person study session.

We conducted usability testing at local libraries with a diverse group of patrons, including older adults and people with disabilities. 

View larger

Step 2: User-Centered Research 
We conducted usability testing at local libraries with a diverse group of patrons, including older adults and people with disabilities. Our specialists then assessed both apps for navigation ease, task flow, clarity, and screen reader compatibility on iOS and Android. Observing real users helped us compare the 2 apps’ strengths and weaknesses. 

Step 3. Final Report 
We then turned our findings into clear, data-driven recommendations. Patrons completed 6 tasks across 26 interfaces on iOS and Android, allowing us to capture success rates, task times, errors, and individual feedback. Seattle Public Library received a report comparing both apps, providing insights to inform their decision.

The Impact

From this research, Seattle Public Library chose a mobile app that exceeded their goals. This human-centered approach prioritized patrons’ experiences and gave Seattle Public Library a scalable framework for basing future decisions on accessibility and usability. 

Downloadable Resource

Unlock powerful human-centered design principles to elevate every project. Get your free 10 Facets of Great UX download today!